REO Properties » REO Properties Blog » FHA Troubles Further Darkening Persisting Foreclosure Clouds

FHA Troubles Further Darkening Persisting Foreclosure Clouds

amidst-foreclosures

Although there is talk about economic recovery foreclosures are persisting as too is unemployment. Troubles in FHA are further darkening prospects. FHA guarantees mortgage loans given by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. These loans are packaged and sold as securities to investors by Government National Mortgage Association or Ginnie Mae. This means if trouble brews, it is the taxpayer that will ultimately have to honour the commitment made to investors.
Former Fannie Mae executive Edward Pinto said that within the next 2 to 3 years the taxpayer will have to do the bailing out. He went to the extents of apprehending that the losses incurred by FHA would wipe out the cash reserves ($30 billion) of the agency.

Last year the two political parties drowned their differences to come together and help Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac out of the mess. They are now trying to rein in FHA. Democrats are insisting that the FHA has a pivotal role to play in the housing sector at a moment when this market is just beginning to stabilize.

Rep. Maxine Waters (Democrat/California) said, “F.H.A. has stepped into the void left by the private market. Let’s be clear; without F.H.A., there would be no mortgage market right now.”

The case of Bernadine Shimon illustrates this point. Like thousands of others she had recently be going through financial problems. She suffered foreclosure of her house, sought bankruptcy, endured divorce and is now a single mother with a job as a teacher in the suburbs of Denver. She too wanted to have another nest but to lenders she was untouchable. FHA was however obliging and insured her mortgage. With it she bought a house for $134,000 last August. The government thus gave her and many others like her another fair chance.

The FHA has been insuring nearly 6,000 mortgage loans or if required refinancing these. The number is four times more than 2006 and it is still growing to the amazement of experts and pundits.

It has been the traditional view that helping those with limited finances like Shimon was not only good for the owner but also for the locality as well as for American brand of capitalism. But this view got a shock with the entry of the housing crisis with a bang. It showed that if lenders permitted people take housing loans they could not afford it meant trouble for all – lenders, borrowers, neighbourhoods and nation.

Leave a Reply